By Jon Sutz
June 30, 2024
The purpose of this report — and more broadly, this new website — is to publicly expose facts that challenge long-held beliefs and assumptions about a widely-respected Jewish nonprofit.
This report is broken down into three parts — the preface, below, which is followed by:
Also see the following directory to supplemental resource pages that contain topic-specific, deep documentation of this report’s core allegations:
ADL vs Twitter 1: All resource pages
Preface: A concept-framing thought experiment
“A lie told once remains a lie, but a lie told a thousand times becomes the truth.”
– Joseph Goebbels
Let us begin with a thought experiment that will help prepare us to evaluate the facts in this report, in a theoretical historic context:
- Imagine Twitter existed in the 1930s and 40s, and its management decided to profit by enabling Nazi propaganda chief Joseph Goebbels to spew all manner of hatred and incitement on the site.
- Now, imagine that the world’s most influential Jewish advocacy group — which publicly designated Goebbels as “the most popular anti-Semite” reaching American audiences — never publicly (a) condemned Twitter’s decision, or (b) held its advertisers to account, for more than eleven years.
- Next, imagine this Jewish advocacy group did this, even though it knew Goebbels’ followers perpetrated at least three racist murder sprees soon after Twitter allowed him to upload a racist violence-inciting video to its platform (which it hosted for the next six years, during which time it amassed nearly 400,000 views).
- Now, imagine if, instead of holding Twitter and its advertisers to account, this Jewish advocacy group engaged in a vast array of hyper-partisan political crusades that had absolutely nothing to do with defending Jews — one of which was to publicly destroy an orthodox Jew whose opinions it didn’t like.
- Finally, imagine if, eight days after a new owner took control of Twitter, this Jewish advocacy group declared war on it – and for the first time ever, called for an advertiser boycott – based on the group’s allegedly “profound concern about anti-Semitism and hate” on the site, which it accused its new owner of unleashing.
Combined, these theoretical scenarios summarize the nature of the fraudulent war that the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) instigated against Elon Musk on November 4, 2022, barely a week after he took control of Twitter. In this case, the man whom the ADL declared “America’s Most Popular Anti-Semite” is Louis Farrakhan. And thanks to the ADL’s conscious, willful complicity, Twitter’s previous management profited by enabling Farrakhan for more than eleven years — as did its vast array of blue-chip advertisers. The purpose of this report is to present the evidence that validates these allegations.
Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan
Three infographics that sum up the remainder of the report
Continue to:
The evidence to validate all of the following assertions is located in a series of supplemental resource pages, linked in each section, in bold-italics. See the master directory and descriptions of all of these resource pages here.
This report is the first in a series.